Rejected by IPL, celebrated by PSL: The illusion of progress and Pakistan's false pride

PSL is an illusion of growth [Source: @JunaidKhanation, @CallMeSheri1_/X.com]

There is a certain romance in watching great players stretch their careers beyond the point most thought possible. But there is also a moment when nostalgia starts getting mistaken for progress, and that is where the Pakistan Super League currently finds itself.

Over the last two seasons, PSL has welcomed a familiar set of names like Faf du Plessis, Moeen Ali, David Warner, Kane Williamson, and possibly Glenn Maxwell next. 

Big careers, heavy CVs, and a combined mountain of IPL runs and trophies. In Pakistan, this trend is being celebrated as a victory. A proof, some argue, that PSL is now “pulling players away” from the IPL.

The reality, however, is far less flattering.

---

ALSO READ

Lights, camera, PR! The PSL illusion or roadshow not sign of growth but masks serious failure

---

When IPL moves on, PSL becomes a safety net for fading stars

(Table: Big names who play in PSL with their age and status in international cricket)

These players aren’t choosing PSL over IPL because it is a bigger or better league. They are choosing PSL because the IPL has moved on.

The IPL, by design, is ruthless. Auctions do not reward past glory anymore. They reward present value and future upside. If your strike rate drops, your body slows down, or your fielding becomes a liability, the league does not wait for sentiment to catch up. 

Younger, cheaper, more explosive options, especially local talents, are always available. That is the ecosystem IPL has deliberately built. 

So when Faf opts out of the IPL auction at 41, or Moeen Ali quietly removes himself from the pool at 38, it isn’t a rejection of IPL. It is an acknowledgement that the league no longer bends to reputation. 

Sitting on a bench for ten weeks, as David Willey mentioned, or going unsold entirely is a far bigger risk than signing a guaranteed PSL deal. 

The real cost of PSL’s star strategy

That being said, PSL offers certainty. It offers leadership roles, captaincy, marquee status, and full-season game time. 

For players at the tail end of their careers, that matters more than prestige. It is not a step up but a soft landing. This is where the false sense of pride creeps in.

Celebrating the arrival of ageing, IPL-discarded stars as proof of growth ignores a more uncomfortable truth, which is that the best version of these players was already consumed by the IPL years ago. 

What remains is experience, not peak performance. And while experience has value, a league cannot claim progress if its biggest selling point is sheltering players who no longer meet the highest competitive standards. 

The contrast becomes even sharper when you look at younger players. Corbin Bosch, Mitchell Owen, Kyle Jamieson, and Kusal Mendis all used PSL as a temporary shop window. 

The moment the IPL called, they left. Contracts were broken, bans were accepted, and safety concerns were suddenly voiced. The hierarchy was obvious.

For emerging talent, PSL is still a stepping stone. For ageing stars, it is a retirement-plus package. That split tells you everything about where the real power lies.

Pakistan are riding on a false victory lap

PSL is not growing by attracting washed-up stars rejected elsewhere. It is standing still while pretending this is evolution. A thriving league develops, exports, and retains prime talent. 

A regressive one becomes a refuge for those the elite level no longer accommodates.

There is nothing wrong with PSL offering veterans a final chapter. Every league needs its storytellers. But mistaking that role for superiority over the IPL is self-deception. 

These players are not quitting IPL because PSL is bigger. They are quitting because the IPL no longer needs them. And that difference matters more than any headline ever will.

---

ALSO READ

"I'm not everyone's cup of tea": Ali Tareen walks away from Multan Sultans after PCB spat

---