• Home
  • Cricket Analysis
  • Gambhir And Gill On Verge Of Disaster Why Excluding Kuldeep Would Be The Worst Decision

Gambhir And Gill On Verge Of Disaster: Why Excluding Kuldeep Would Be The Worst Decision

Probuddha Bhattacharjee

Kuldeep Yadav [Source: AP Photos]Kuldeep Yadav [Source: AP Photos]

India's humiliating five-wicket defeat at Headingly exposed some glaring weaknesses in their bowling attack. The first Test raised some urgent questions about team selection for the second Test at Edgbaston. 

With speculation mounting that Washington Sundar might be preferred over Kuldeep Yadav, the new leadership duo of captain Shubman Gill and coach Gautam Gambhir face a series-defining moment.

The Headingley Reality Check

India's loss at Leeds was more than just disappointing; it revealed multiple holes in the team's composition. Despite posting 471 and 364 runs in the two innings, featuring five centuries from Indian batters, they couldn't prevent England from taking down the 371 target with relative ease in the final innings of the game. The fundamental issue was crystal clear: India's ability to take 20 wickets consistently.

Jasprit Bumrah's heroic five-wicket haul in the first innings masked the bowling unit's broader struggles. Shardul Thakur managed just 2/78 across both innings, bowling only 16 overs while contributing a meagre 1 and 4 with the bat. More troubling was the fact that the pitch offered a bit to the spinner on days four and five; India's sole spin option, Ravindra Jadeja, failed to make any impact. 

The Kuldeep Conundrum

Kuldeep Yadav's exclusion from Headingly's playing XI raised eyebrows among cricket experts and fans. The left-arm wrist-spinner numbers, which can be considered more than average in Test cricket. He has picked up 56 wickets at an average of 22.16 in just 13 Test matches at a strike rate of 37.4. He also has some significant numbers against England. In six Test matches against the Three Lions, Kuldeep has picked up 21 wickets at an average of 22.28 while maintaining a strike rate of 38.70.

Is Washington Sundar The Correct Choice

While Washington Sundar brings batting depth as an all-rounder, this approach somehow reflects the same flawed thinking on the part of the Indian management that led to the downfall at Headingley. 

The obsession of this new leadership group with lower-order runs has consistently undermined the prime objective needed to win a Test match: taking the 20 wickets of the opposition. Sundar's bowling, though competent, lacks the X-factor required to unsettle England's Bazball approach. 

England used the sweep shot very effectively against Jadeja at Leeds. Notably, this shot could be significantly more challenging to execute against a wrist spinner like Kuldeep Yadav because of his natural variation and unpredictable flight.

Defensive Mindset Betrays Philosophy

Both Captain Gill and Head Coach Gambhir have emphasised India's positive intent and aggressive all-out attitude. However, selecting Sundar over Kuldeep would expose the still underlying defensive thinking as rhetoric.

This exact conserving approach has haunted Indian cricket in overseas conditions for years.

Conclusion

With India trailing 0-1 and Bumrah looking to play only three of the five Tests due to workload management, every selection decision becomes crucial. Excluding Kuldeep would not only waste his proven match-winning ability but also signal that the new leadership lacks he mentality to take bold calls or implement their stated philosophy when it matters the most. The choice between safe mediocrity and tactical boldness will shape the era of Gambhir and Gill. At Edgbaston, there is only one synonym of the bold choice: Kuldeep Yadav.