• Home
  • Cricket Analysis
  • Legend O Meter A Cricket Legend Or Highlight Reel Player Ben Stokes Reality Check

Legend-O-Meter: A Cricket Legend Or Highlight Reel Player? Ben Stokes Reality Check



Ben Stokes [Source: AP Photos]Ben Stokes [Source: AP Photos]

Our Legend-o-Meter examines cricket's most prominent names through a data-driven approach, combining statistical analysis, peer comparisons, contextual factors, and impact assessment to determine actual legendary status. Each player receives a comprehensive rating from 1 to 10, weighing both numerical and narrative elements to answer the question: genuine legend or overhyped reputation?

In this article, we take a look at the current red-ball captain of England, Ben Stokes. When the English all-rounder smashed his way to World Cup glory in 2019, the cricketing fraternity proclaimed him the greatest all-rounder of his generation.

 Now, let us strip away the emotion and examine just the numbers - does Stoes deserve legendary status, or is he one of the cricket's most overrated superstars?

The Statistical Foundation

Stokes has played 269 international matches across 14 years, accumulating respectable batting numbers while struggling significantly with the ball in hand.

Ben Stokes' Complete Career Numbers

Format
Matches
Runs (Avg)
Wickets (Avg)
Strike Rate
Economy
Tests1126,781 (35.13)218 (32.58)57.4 balls/wicket3.33
ODIs1143,463 (41.00)74 (42.59)42.93 balls/wicket4.82
T20Is43585 (22.50)24 (35.45)32.92 balls/wicket8.39

Comparison With Peers: The Brutal Truth

Player
Test Runs (Avg)
Test Wickets (Avg)
Wickets Per Match
All-Rounder Rating
Ravindra Jadeja3,122 (36.13)299 (24.14)4.15Genuine
Ravichandran Ashwin3,422 (25.75)523 (23.75)5.56Elite
Shakib Al Hasan4,609 (38.44)246 (30.83)4.1Quality
BEN STOKES6,781 (35.13)218 (32.58)1.95Part-timer

The Reality Revealed By Numbers

  • Wickets per match: Ben Stokes averages below 2 wickets per Test - on the basis of pure statistics he can be categorised as barely a fifth bowler.
  • Bowling average: 32.58 can make him a legendary all-rounder in first-class cricket, not at the international level.
  • Strike Rate: Takes a wicket nearly every 57 deliveries (9.3 overs) - decent frequency
  • Economy Paradox: Economical bowler at 3.33 runs per over but ineffective in converting pressure into wickets.

Ben Stokes is a useful holding bowler who occasionally strikes but lacks the penetration.

Ben Stokes [Source: AP Photos]Ben Stokes [Source: AP Photos]

The Case FOR Legend Status

1. Moment Merchant Excellence

Delivered In The Biggest Moments: The most significant highlights of his career are the 2019 World Cup stunner (84*), Headingley miracle (135*) in The Ashes, and 2022 T20 WC Final's game-defining knock (52*).

2. Records Under His Belt

Ben Stokes has the most sixes in Test cricket, has scored the most runs at number six in an innings (258) and was a part of the highest-ever partnership for the sixth wicket in Test matches.

3. Impact On The Game

Along with coach Brendon McCullum, Stokes introduced a style of play in cricket that prefers intent and aggressiveness over safe cricket. 'Bazball' is popularly known by this name and has brought about a shift in the way Test cricket is perceived and played today.

The Case AGAINST Legend Status

1. Batting Mediocrity

A test average of 35.13 can be termed good, but it is nothing brilliant or elite. For someone claiming legendary status, this is disappointingly ordinary.

T20I average of just 22.50 suggests significant struggles in cricket's most popular format.

2. Bowling Limitations

Ben Stokes averages 32.58 runs per wicket in Test cricket. This is significantly higher than elite all-rounders, who average 20-25.

While economical, he lacks penetration, requiring nearly 33 runs before taking each wicket.

3. Wicket-Taking Inefficiency

He takes wickets every 57.4 balls (reasonable frequency) but costs 32.58 runs per wicket—far too costly.

Elite all-rounders like Jadeja (24.14) and Ashwin (23.75) had secured wickets at a significantly lower cost.

Ben Stokes [Source: AP Photos]Ben Stokes [Source: AP Photos]

Advanced Analytics: Complete Player Assessment

Batting Analysis

Test Batting Reality: 35.13 average ranks as above-average in Test cricket hierarchy—elite batters average 45-50+.

Format Comparison: The ODI average of 41.00 is significantly better than the Test average, suggesting white-ball specialist tendencies.

Ben Stokes century conversion as per matches [Source: OneCricket]Ben Stokes century conversion as per matches [Source: OneCricket]

Conversion Rate: 13 centuries from 164 Test innings = 7.9% conversion rate (elite batters typically achieve 12-15%).

Bowling Reality Check

  • Economy vs Average: Economical at 3.33 runs per over but inefficient at 32.58 runs per wicket cost.
  • Strike Rate: Takes wickets every 57.4 balls—reasonable frequency for a fifth bowler option.
  • Wicket-Taking Output: 1.95 wickets per Test match falls short of genuine all-rounder standards (3+ expected)

Legend-O-Meter Verdict: Average All-rounder With Great Moments - 5.5/10

Ben Stokes overall career impact [Source: OneCricket]Ben Stokes overall career impact [Source: OneCricket]

The Final Analysis: Ben Stokes is an above-average Test batsman with bowling abilities to be a good fifth option (32.58 average)—nowhere near the standards required for all-rounder legendary status.

While he has delivered memorable moments, his baseline statistics reveal a player who is merely decent at both disciplines rather than excelling in either. Elite Test batters average 45-50+; elite all-rounder bowlers average 25-30. Stokes achieves neither standard.

Bottom Line: Stokes is cricket's ultimate "moments player"—brilliant when it matters most but statistically ordinary across his career.

A 35-batting average combined with a 32+ bowling average represents a solid international cricketer, not a legend. His reputation rests on five to six defining performances rather than sustained excellence across 269 international matches.

The Uncomfortable Truth: Stokes wouldn't make an all-time England XI purely on merit. His bowling isn't good enough, and his batting, while excellent, isn't transcendent sufficient to compensate.

Are we too easily impressed by dramatic moments? Does consistent statistical excellence matter more than clutch performances? Share your Legend-O-Meter rating below.