SA20 has thrived but black African players struggle for game time [Source: @BasithSab, @SA20_League/x.com]
The SA20 has taken South African cricket to new heights by infusing fresh energy into the domestic circuit and drawing global attention. It is fast, it’s exciting and it is backed by some of the biggest names in world cricket.
However, when we scratch beneath the surface, we can see there is an underlying issue that refuses to go unnoticed: the struggle of black African players to find meaningful game time in the tournament.
While SA20 has transformed the T20 scene in the country, it is not exactly a level playing field for everyone. With only 10 black African players picked across the six teams, the numbers are concerning and the lack of opportunities is even more flustering. In fact, Pretoria Capitals didn't even have a single black African player in their squad.
So, what exactly is going on? Why aren’t more black African cricketers getting a fair shot in a league that’s meant to represent the best of South African cricket?
A Seat on the Bench More Than a Spot on the Field
If Kagiso Rabada, Kwena Maphaka and Lutho Sipamla hadn’t made regular appearances in nine matches each, the numbers would look even bleaker. Outside of this trio, most black African players barely got a look-in.
Take a look at the SA20 2025 game time stats of Black African players:
- Sibonelo Makhanya played just two games for Joburg Super Kings.
- Nqaba Peter featured in only one match for Paarl Royals.
- Andile Simelane got just two outings for Sunrisers Eastern Cape.
- Okuhle Cele didn’t step onto the field even once.
These numbers don’t show a pretty picture. The problem isn’t just selection, it’s the lack of trust in these players to perform at the highest level.
Who Calls The Shots In SA20 Selection?
It’s clear that Indian investors hold the reins in SA20 and transformation is not exactly on their radar. Unlike Cricket South Africa (CSA), which enforces quotas at national and domestic levels, SA20 operates purely on private investment principles.
Graeme Smith, the SA20 commissioner, made it clear that team owners dictate selections and CSA doesn’t have the authority to intervene.
“Cricket South Africa made a decision that once private investment came in, the league would provide the platform for players but selection of players would come from the teams themselves,” Smith said.
This essentially means that while the SA20 provides a stage, it doesn’t guarantee fair opportunities for all.
The Transformation Debate Continues
Smith did acknowledge the issue, saying that SA20 is working alongside CSA to expand the talent pipeline and develop grassroots programs. He mentioned that the league launched new school-level initiatives this year, making it the biggest private investor in cricket development outside of CSA.
But here’s the catch; development means little if players don’t get actual opportunities to prove themselves on the big stage. Tournaments like SA20 are meant to bridge the gap between domestic and international cricket yet if black African players aren’t playing, how do they develop into future stars?
What Next?
The SA20’s success is undeniable but the lack of representation raises serious concerns. If more black African players aren’t integrated into teams, the league risks becoming a closed-door event for only a select few cricketers.
CSA may not have full control over SA20 selections but if real transformation is the goal, there needs to be a stronger push to ensure every deserving player gets a fair shot.
Because at the end of the day, cricket should be about talent, not just opportunity. And until that balance is struck, questions will keep being asked.