• Home
  • Cricket News
  • Split Coaches In Different Formats Are The Way Forward In Cricket Heres What Experts Say

Split coaches in different formats are the way forward in cricket? Here's what experts say

Much like players opting for certain formats or are forced to do so in the wake of speciality in cricket, certain former players and experts believe that coaches too need to specialise in different formats. In a podcast former West Indies fast bowler Ian Bishop revealed that he thinks specialisation in coaching is almost knocking on the door. 

“The fact that we want all the best players playing all the formats and that poses problems for people like Moods (Tom Moody), who have the task fo making players succeed in all the formats,” Freddie Wilde, author of the famous book Cricket 2.0 told Bishop on The Pitch Side Experts Podcast. 

Responding to that, Bishop also echoed his thoughts. “You read my mind, I was just going to end it with it. Moods, my heart goes out to you and I wonder, It’s no surprise there seems to be a specialisation in even in the coaching ranks apart from the few very best who are able to coach across formats,” said the man with 279 international wickets.  

“Given the demands and multiplicity of the skills that one had to bring to the table, and even to the commentators,” Bishop added, indicating that doing everything in all three formats for all people involved with the game is getting relatively difficult. 

Earlier, Darren Lehmann, former Australia coach had propagated the multiple coach theory or split coaching. “I think split coaches is the way to go in India as well as here[England]. You just can’t be away for 200 days a year. It’s too much for the family and it’s too much pressure on a single coach,” Lehmann had said on a podcast with Michael Vaughan. 

“I think to get longevity out of your coaches you have to have split roles,” he had added.

Discover more

Top Stories
news

ENG vs SL | 1st ODI: Sri Lanka suffer another batting collapse as hosts take upper hand

Sri Lanka’s batting woes continued against England in the first ODI of the series after Chris Woakes and David Willey ripped apart the batting unit at Chester-le-Street as the visitors were bundled out for 185. After being put into bat, Sri Lanka had a struggling start after openers Pathum Nissanka and Kusal Perera only managed to put 23 on the board for the first wicket. Nissanka was the first one to depart for 5 after he was removed by Chris Woakes and his dismissal was followed by a couple of more wickets going down in quick succession. The visiting team was struggling at 46/3 when captain Perera was joined by Wanindu Hasaranga in the middle and the two tried to show some resistance after stitching a stand of 99 runs. But Hasaranga miscued a pull stroke on a short delivery from Woakes and was caught in the deep by Livingstone for 54. The right-handed batsman’s departure broke the shackles and the visitors suffered another collapse where they were reduced to 160/8 with Perera who was also back in the hut. He was undone by David Willey for 73. A lot of credit goes to the English bowlers also, especially Woakes and Willey. The two pacers troubled the Sri Lankan batsmen with the pace and some disciplined line and length. Woakes eventually returned with a four-wicket haul while Willey had three wickets to his name during the course. While the home side was impressive with the bowling, the fielding was on spot as well. Sri Lanka lost their last two wickets, courtesy runout with Sam Billings being involved in both of them. Billings repeated what he did in the last T20I when he sent Dasun Shanaka packing. The right-hander came charging in from the deep to hit the bull’s eye at the non-striker’s end and sent Shanaka back in the pavilion. This time it was Praveen Jayawickrama at the receiving end in a similar manner. But this isn’t the first instance where Sri Lanka have suffered a batting collapse. Something similar was witnessed during the T20I series between the two sides which the Lankan side lost 0-3.