We didn’t have that luxury: Kapil Dev on Kohli’s paternity leave

India’s first World Cup-winning captain and arguably the greatest all-rounder India has ever produced, Kapil Dev, said that Sunil Gavaskar was not able to see his newborn son for months. He said that in comparison to current India captain Virat Kohli’s paternity leave, which he also termed a privilege that cricketers in his era couldn’t have.

“Don’t think we could afford to go and come back. That’s for sure. Sunil Gavaskar didn’t see his son for many months. It was a different thing. Look, things change. If I talk about Kohli, when his father died, he came back playing cricket the next day. Today he is taking a leave for his baby. It's fine, you can afford it,” Kapil said while speaking via video conference at HTLS 2020.

The Septuagenarian former cricketer said that he was happy for the 32-year-old Indian captain that he was able to be with his family in moments of such intimacy.

“You can buy a plane and go back and come back again in three days. I feel happy and proud that today sportsmen have reached a level where they can do this. I’m happy for Virat. He’s coming back to see his family. I understand you have passion but the biggest passion is that he’s having a baby,” he said.

Powered by Froala Editor

Powered by Froala Editor

Discover more
Top Stories
news

Guha targets BCCI Prez Ganguly, says his greed for money is shocking

Ramchandra Guha has attacked BCCI President and former India captain, Sourav Ganguly, accusing him of being greedy over petty money. Guha, launching an attack on the Kolkata born said, “Look at Ganguly today—head of the Board and representing some cricket fantasy game, this kind of greed for money among Indian cricketers is shocking.” Guha was being interviewed by Mid Day post the launch of his book - The Commonwealth of Cricket: A Lifelong Love Affair with the Most Subtle and Sophisticated Game Known to Humankind. To contrast the BCCI boss’ image, the historian presented former India spinner Bishan Singh Bedi as an example. “The most telling story in my book is about Bishan Singh Bedi saying that he is happy to go to Kabul [to coach Afghan cricketers]—anywhere for cricket and not anywhere for money,” he said. “Why should Ganguly be doing all these things for a little extra money?” Gugha asked. “Ethical standards go down if the president of the Board behaves like this. What Ganguly is doing now is incorrect and no other country would allow it,” said Guha, differentiating how cricket is seen and represented in different countries. The former member of the Committee of Administrators did not hold back anything on attacking the overarching influence of the cricket board in India and how it is doing more harm than good to the game. He illustrated that through the case of commentator Sanjay Manjrekar. “Gags on commentators are bad. That Sanjay Manjrekar has to beg to be readmitted [in the commentary team] is pathetic. Why should the Board have [power over] commentary? It's absurd. It never happens anywhere in the world. Can you imagine the English Premier League doing this?” he said.

news

WBBL: Sydney Sixers fined $25,000 for naming wrong player on team sheet

In a bizarre administrative error, a player not part of the primary squad of the 15 players was named in the playing XI by Women’s Big Bash League team Sydney Sixers, leading to a fine of $25,000 by Cricket Australia, the cricketing authority in the country. Sixers named fast bowler Hayley Silver-Holmes on the team sheet against Melbourne Renegades, however, Holmes, who had been injured prior to this game was not even part of the primary squad of 15. Although she had recovered from injury, her return to the squad was still pending approval from WBBL's technical committee. The fine though was reduced one, for the misjudgment was self-reported by the Sixers team. The cause was helped by the fact that Holmes did not bat in the first innings as she wasn’t required. Sixers had reported the administrative error by then and Holmes could not come out to bowl in the second. The Sixers remained one bowler short, losing the match eventually in the final over. Out of the 25k, $15,000 is suspended because of Sixers' prompt action and co-operation with the integrity and security committee. Cricket Australia's Senior Conduct Commissioner, Alan Sullivan QC said that the maximum penalty of $50,000 and/or additional sanctions were "not deemed appropriate given the nature of the breach and the fact Sixers lost the match and adversely impacted their Net Run Rate". Sean Carroll, CA's Head of Integrity and Security, said: "Cricket Australia places a significant emphasis on the integrity of all competitions, including the compliance with its player contracting rules and regulations. This breach by the Sydney Sixers, while serious in nature, had a reduced impact due to the Club's actions during last night's game. As such, we support the findings of Alan Sullivan QC, including the suspension of $15,000 of the $25,000 fine imposed."