Laws are written in favor of batsman: Ian Chappell

The 2018 sandpaper gate controversy surfaced once again after Australia’s Cameron Bancroft made few bold statements regarding the matter. Bancroft suggested that the bowling unit had an idea about what was happening on the field in Newlands. 

The bowling attack consisting of Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc and off-spinner Nathan Lyon later issued a joint statement denying the claims made by Bancroft. 

The former Australian cricketer Ian Chappell has now suggested some alternatives that can help in preventing the players from taking such action. 

“I think about 20 years ago, I said what they should do is go to the captains of every country and you get a list of things that they think will help the ball swing. Then you send us all these lists, we’ll go through them and we’ll come up with one thing and it will be a sensible thing, not using a bottle cap to scrape the ball. It’ll be viable but we’ll give you one thing that’ll help you swing the ball and everything else will be illegal,” Chappell said during a discussion on ESPNcricinfo.

He further went on to say that the laws generally favour the batsmen more than the bowlers. 

“Let’s look at the way the laws are written. They are pretty much always written in favor of the batsman and if you go right back to underarm bowling to sidearm bowling… to body line and ball-tampering – they all come about because the balance is too much in favor of the batsmen and the bowlers eventually say ‘we have had enough, we are mad as hell and we are going to do something about it’,” he further added.

Bancroft was earlier banned for nine months by Cricket Australia while the then captain Steve Smith and opening batsman David Warner were slapped with a one-year ban each.



Discover more
Top Stories
news

It's actually the batsmen at fault: Tabraiz Shamsi backs Mankading

South African left-arm chinaman bowler Tabraiz Shamsi has come in support of ‘Mankading’ and has stated that it is well within the rules of cricket and the bowler shouldn’t be held responsible for running out a batman in that manner and rather a batsman should be held responsible for not upholding the spirit of the game. Indian off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin who has always been vocal about this particular form of dismissal had demanded free balls whenever the non-striker tries to steal an extra yard. Like when a bowler is penalised for bowling a no-ball, Ashwin feels that a free ball would ensure that the non-striker remains at the crease until the bowler completes his action. Former Indian cricketer and currently one of the leading commentators, Sanjay Manjrekar had earlier written a column in Hindustan Times and had asked fans and cricket followers to come up with more suggestions of the rule changes in the game which they look forward to. In response, Ashwin had recommended a free ball to a bowler. In the particular Twitter thread shared by Manjrekar, Ashwin indulged in a conversation with a Twitter user where he mentioned why bowlers tend to refrain from running out a batsman in that manner. “The mental trauma that the bowlers may go through stops them from doing it,” Ashwin had tweeted. Replying to that particular response, Tabraiz Shamsi said that he fails to understand the reason why bowlers are held accountable for running out a batsman when actually the batsman is at fault. Quite often we have seen the non-striker batsman strolling out of his crease. Until recent times, most of the bowlers have refrained from Mankading the batsman as it is considered against the spirit of the game. "@ashwinravi99 I think all the bowlers should do it without any fear… it’s within the rules of the game. Why must the bowlers get abused about the “spirit of cricket” when it’s actually the batsmen that are stealing yards and THAT is against the spirit of cricket. That’s the real truth,” Shami tweeted. Ashwin received criticism from all quarters when he ran out Jos Buttler in a group game during the 2019 edition of the Indian Premier League. The off-spinner recently mentioned an incident when his Punjab Kings (then Kings XI Punjab) teammate Ankit Rajpoot had refused to Mankad a batsman when the match was firmly on the line and could have resulted in a win for his team. Rajpoot told his skipper Ashwin that he will be made the villain if he runs out the batsmen in that manner.

news

Tamim Iqbal 'disappointed' at losing 10 ODI Super League points even Bangladesh clinch ODI series

Bangladesh won their first bilateral series against Sri Lanka but skipper Tamim Iqbal has chosen to not overlook the flaws in his side after the loss in the third and final ODI of the series. He expressed disappointment although his side won the series and pointed out that the Bangladesh ODI side has a lot to do in near future irrespective of a win in the series against Sri Lanka. "I am disappointed. If we forget everything just because we won the series, it is the same thing when we come and say after a series loss that we have a lot of work to do. I will say the same thing after this series win: we have a lot to improve on,” Tamim said in the post-match press conference. Apart from the improvement and flaws, Tamim was also unhappy at letting go of 10 points which he said can come back to hurt his side in future as the ICC ODI super League has made every series relevant. Every game of the series accounted for 10 points each and while Bangladesh pocketed 20 points on the back of wins in the first two games, Sri Lanka bounced back strongly to claim 10 in the last game of the series. He emphasized the need for improvement in the fielding department after lapses in the last ODI while also lamented the underuse of the potential in the bowling department. "You never know, these ten points could bother us later. The ICC ODI Super League is not like a typical bilateral series. When we had the opportunity, we should have finished it properly. We won the series, but I don't think we played really well. We bowled well, but we have more potential in our batting unit. Fielding was okay in the first two matches, but it was the same-old fielding today. We [dropped] important catches at important times,” Tamim reckoned. However, in the face of disappointment and urge for improvements, Tamim did not criticise players by their names and instead backed them to come good with time which he said will make Bangladesh a ‘stronger’ team.’ "Criticising them is easy, but I don't like to criticise my players. I know how hard they are working. They haven't performed up to their expectations. I am sure they will put up a good performance soon. When they will perform, we become a stronger team,” Tamim backed his players. Tamim himself had a disappointing end of the series with both the on-field umpire and the third umpire adjudging him out caught behind when he was ‘100 per cent sure’ of not edging the ball. "It was very disappointing. I was 100 percent sure that I never nicked it. It was very unfortunate that when it went to review, it was almost impossible for the umpire to overturn the decision. If the on-field umpire didn't give that out, it would have been a different thing,” Tamim asserted. There was a lot riding on Tamim’s shoulder after the fall of quick wickets at the top of the order and when he was sent back to the pavilion, there was no short of emotions and disagreements from his side to the umpires.