• Home
  • Cricket News
  • Gavaskar Attacks Kohli Alleges Different Rules For Different Players In Team India

Gavaskar attacks Kohli, alleges ‘different rules for different players’ in Team India


Batting legend Sunil Gavaskar has lambasted the Indian team management for what he believes are ‘different rules for different players’ in the team set up, as well as the lack of humility in the leadership group to accept ‘forthrightness’ of players who disagree with their viewpoints. 

Gavaskar has hit out at captain Virat Kohli’s decision to return home mid-series for the birth of his first child while others, such as pacer T Natarajan, did not get the chance to see his newborn due to the ongoing tour. Gavaskar put forward this criticism in his column for Sportstar magazine.

“Another player who will wonder about the rules but, of course, can’t make any noise about it as he is a newcomer. It is T Natarajan. The left-arm yorker specialist who made an impressive debut in the T20 and had Hardik Pandya gallantly offering to share the Man of the T20 Series prize with him, had become a father for the first time even as the IPL playoffs were going on,” Gavaskar wrote.

Gavaskar also pointed out the unfairness handed out to Natarajan as he was asked to stay in Australia even after the completion of the white-ball leg of the tour, but not as part of the squad, but as a net bowler whose job is to help batsmen prepare for the Test series. Gavaskar strongly objected to the different set of standards being followed while making decisions about ‘paternity leaves’ of players.

“...he was asked to stay on for the (Australia) Test series but not as a part of the team but as a net bowler. Imagine that! A match-winner, albeit in another format, being asked to be a net bowler. He will thus return home only after the series ends in the third week of January and get to see his daughter for the first time then. And there is the captain (Virat Kohli) going back after the first Test for the birth of his first child,” The former India captain noted.

On the issue of lack of heart in the leadership group, Gavaskar referred to off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin who, Gavaskar believes, has been treated unfairly, not for his bowling on overseas tours, but for his ‘forthrightness.’ He said that the team management always keeps a sword hanging on Ashwin and in case of an average outing on the field, he is made to sit out, while other players of the team, such as batsmen, don’t have to go face such rigorous standards of success and failure.

“For far too long, Ashwin has suffered not for his bowling ability of which only the churlish will have doubts, but for his forthrightness and speaking his mind at meetings where most others just nod even if they don’t agree. If Ashwin doesn’t take heaps of wickets in one game, he is invariably sidelined for the next one. That does not happen to established batsmen though,” Gavaskar reckoned.

There has been a history between Sunil Gavaskar and Virat Kohli and his actress wife Anushka Sharma. The latter had responded to Gavaskar when the former batting maestro had taken her name while discussing the batting form of the Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) captain Virat Kohli in IPL 2020. In what was intended as a harmless light-hearted comment about a video showing Kohli playing cricket with his wife, Gavaskar used words which Anushka interpreted as a vulgar double entendre. The Indian legend clarified that his words were not intended as anything of the kind. 

Powered by Froala Editor

Powered by Froala Editor

Powered by Froala Editor

Powered by Froala Editor

Discover more
Top Stories
news

Bedi angered by Jaitley's statue at Kotla, wants his name removed from stand

Indian cricket legend Bishan Singh Bedi has asked Delhi District Cricket Association (DDCA) to remove his name from that of a stand in the Arun Jaitley Stadium, formerly known as Feroz Shah Kotla Stadium. The former left-arm spinner has made this move to protest the decision of the body to erect a statue of Arun Jaitley, the late political leader and Minister of Finance and Defence in the Government of India, who also served as the President of DDCA. Bedi had been a strident critic of Jaitley and had made accusations of mishandling the DDCA affairs even during the deceased politician's lifetime. Allegations of financial malpractices had also been levelled by several dissidents and activists. Currently, Rohan Jaitley, son of the late leader, heads the body. Bedi has alleged that nepotism is at play and has even renounced his membership of the association. The former India captain wrote a long letter to Rohan Jaitley, expressing his strong disagreement with the proposed move and reminded the current President of the tradition of building statues of cricketers at major stadium. Bedi said that since Arun Jaitley was a politician and, according to him, his tenure as DDCA President was mired with corruption, he is completely undeserving to have his statue in the stadium's premises. The letter, which has been published in its entirety by several publications on their websites, pulls no punches in criticising the late DDCA head. He thanked the people who took the decision to name a stand in the stadium after him. But the former cricketer said that his 'patience' and 'tolerance' has run out with this proposed move. Bedi was part of a group of former cricketers who had opposed Jaitley. The allegations of corruption became a major political issue and even came up in the Parliament. Arun Jaitley even made a statement on the floor of Lok Sabha defending himself and filed a defamation suit against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for making similar allegations. The charges haven't been proven and Kejriwal had to issue a public apology for making the allegations. Former cricketers like Aakash Chopra and Gautam Gambhir, the latter now a Member of Parliament himself from BJP, had also defended Jaitley's handling of DDCA. In his letter, Bedi also accused the former DDCA President of destroying the aesthetics of the stadium in the renovation that was carried out during Arun Jaitley's tenure. This story is likely to draw a strong response from both camps - pro and anti-Jaitley.

news

BBL 10 | Heat vs Strikers: Adelaide hold nerve in a humdinger

It turned out to be one of the most classic BBL matches and in the end, it was the Adelaide Strikers who scraped through and ended up winning the 13th match of the tournament by just 2 runs. Stand-in skipper for the Brisbane Heat, Jimmy Peirson played a stellar knock and almost snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. The Strikers after being put in to bat made a good recovery to post 152 on the board. The target looked way too much for the Heat after losing 8 wickets for just 68 runs but Peirson and Mujeeb brought them back into the game but couldn’t quite get them over the line in the end. Earlier in the day, it was Brisbane Heat designated skipper Chris Lynn who went for the toss and opted to field. However, he suffered a hamstring injury just minutes before the match and Jimmy Pierson was handed over the captaincy in his absence. The Strikers lost Jack Weatherald in the very first over and the Brisbane Heat bowlers never really allowed the batters to get under their skin in the first 5 overs. Philip Salt survived a few close shaves and went onto make 25 but the innings was scratchy and didn’t allow the Strikers to get after the bowlers. A partnership of 60 runs with Matt Renshaw meant that the Strikers had a launching pad for the final stretch of the innings but both Renshaw and Salt was dismissed in back to back deliveries by Mark Steketee which put the Strikers on the backfoot. Two new batsmen in and the pressure as well and truly on the Strikers but they did manage to eke out a few crucial partnerships which eventually helped them go past the 150 mark, Jonathan Wells looked in good touch and made good use of the power surge which the Strikers took in the 17th over. Two overs yielded 25 runs and it did help them gain some sort of momentum. Harry Neilsen also chipped in with a vital knock of 28 of 20 deliveries and struck some crisp boundaries during the course of his innings. However the Brisbane Heat bowlers never really allowed the Strikers to get away with the game and restricted them to 152. The pick of the bowlers for the Brisbane Heat was Xavier Bartlett who bowled good lines and bagged 3 wickets while Mark Steketee chipped in with a couple. The Brisbane Heat needed to get off to a good start and the Strikers needed some early wickets. Yet again the bowling department didn’t disappoint as the Strikers struck twice in the first 8 deliveries and things looked very difficult for the Heats from thereon. Daniel Worral and Danny Briggs bagged the two early wickets to put the Heats on the backfoot. After a brief partnership of 23 runs between Max Bryant and Daniel Lawrence, it was Rashid Khan who spun a web around the Heat batters and turned the game on its head. He bagged the wicket of Max Bryant in the very first delivery of his spell and followed it up with one more in the form of Lawrence in his very next over. From there on it was a mountain too steep to climb for the Heat. They kept losing wickets and it was the Strikers who looked like running away with the match. They were reduced to 68/8 and it looked all over for the Heat. Yet again there was an umpiring howler when Tom Cooper was adjudged LBW despite a clear under edge onto his pads. This has raised the debate yet again that whether DRS should be a part of every big tournament. However, what transpired next was something which no one would have predicted. No 10 Mujeeb ur Rahman suddenly turned the complexion of the game with some exceptional hitting in the 15th over of his fellow countryman Rashid Khan. The 20 runs over gave them some momentum to work with and skipper Jimmy Peirson grabbed that with both hands. He simply launched into the Strikers’ bowlers and kept plundering them for boundaries after boundaries. It was quite heartening to see the fact that the duo was still fighting from a hopeless situation. 51 runs came in just 14 deliveries and the match had turned on its head. However, the wickets column was the only bother for the Brisbane Heat. With 23 required of the last 3, Peter Siddle took the onus on himself and produced a magical over where he got the wicket of Mujeeb to again push the Brisbane Heat on the backfoot. Ben Laughlin played out a few overs and with Peirson on strike for the final over with 13 runs required the scales were slightly tilted in favour of the Heat especially due to the way he had batted in the last few overs. Eventually, his valiant effort wasn’t enough as the Heat fell short by just 2 runs