• Home
  • Cricket News
  • Aus Vs Ind Labuschagne Offers To Open In Place Of Injured Warner

AUS vs IND: Labuschagne offers to open in place of injured Warner

Australian middle-order batsman Marnus Labuschagne has offered to open in place of the injured David Warner, who has been ruled out of the 3rd and final ODI of the three-match series between Australia and India. 

Warner has also been ruled out from the upcoming T20I series between the two nations as well. D’Arcy Short has been drafted in the Aussie squad as his replacement. 

"If I got asked to open the batting absolutely it's an opportunity that I would enjoy doing. We'll wait and see how our team shapes up for the next game and see the balance of the side, but yeah I would love doing it," Marnus said in a press conference. 

The 26-year-old, who made 70 runs of 60 balls in the last game said,  "My role at No.4 is just to read the situation of the game and play my role accordingly.”

Saying that his role while batting with Steve Smith, who scored two back to back 62 ball centuries was just to rotate the strike and build a partnership, was pleasantly surprised with the batting of his senior pro. 

"We had Steve in so when I came to the crease it was just about building a partnership and a bit of momentum with him, and taking a back seat for the start of my innings,” he said. 

"That was one of the best innings I've seen in one-day cricket, not only from Steve but from anyone. I think the way he batted yesterday was superb. It almost felt like he didn't give an opportunity, didn't really take any risk, but he got a hundred off 62 balls,” he added. 

Powered by Froala Editor

Discover more
Top Stories
news

Can’t understand that kind of captaincy: Gambhir lambasts Kohli

Former India opener Gautam Gambhir threw a barrage of questions toward the Indian captain Virat Kohli for his lack of planning, or rather the non-synchronization of it. Gambhir’s locus-standi, though was Jasprit Bumrah being taken off the attack after bowling just two overs in his opening spell. "I can't understand the captaincy, to be honest. We kept talking about how important is to take wickets upfront if we have to stop this kind of batting line-up and then you make your premier bowler bowl two overs,” asked Gambhir during a talk show on a cricket website. “Normally, in a One Day game, there are three spells of 4-3-3 overs. Or probably the maximum is four overs," he added. The 39-year-old Parliamentarian from Delhi also accused Kohli of following a T20 model of captaincy in ODI cricket. "But if you stop your premier fast bowler just by bowling two overs upfront with the new ball, I can't understand that kind of captaincy. I probably can't even explain that captaincy. It is not T20 cricket. I probably can't understand the reason to be honest because that was poor captaincy," he said. The lack of sixth bowler topic was also raised by the former Delhi captain, saying that it was an error on the part of selectors that they went to Australia with just one all-rounder in one squad. "They could have given someone like Washington Sundar or Shivam Dube or whoever was there in the squad to play the next game and see how they go into the one-day format. But if you don't have anyone in Australia then it is a selection error as well," Gambhir said.

news

World Test Championship could be scrapped, ICC Chairman hints

The new chairman of International Cricket Council (ICC), Greg Barclays, has expressed his disappointment with the way World Test Championship (WTC) has had to be conducted. He candidly told journalists in a press conference that the COVID-19 pandemic has severely damaged the value of the ongoing Test tournament. Answering a specific question about whether the WTC has achieved the intended goal of making Test cricket more appealing, Barclays answered, "In short, I don’t think so. The COVID has probably highlighted its shortcomings of the championship." The chairman further added that: "The issues that we have already got, I wonder whether some of it was because of an attempt to develop a Test Championship, clearly designed to drive interest back into Test cricket, provide a bit of context and relevance around the Test matches. "From an idealist’s point of view, probably it had a lot of merit but practically, I do disagree, I am not sure whether it has achieved what it intended to do." The WTC began last year and was progressing as per the schedule but then COVID-19 threw the calendar into a muddle. As a result, many of the bilateral series that teams had to play can no longer take place before the date of the final, set to take place at Lord's Cricket Ground next year. ICC had to change the rules of the tournament in order to accomodate the altered circumstances. What is even more ominous is the fact that the ICC chairman dropped a hint of actually scrapping the tournament altogether after the first edition gets finished. "My personal view is let’s get through with the little bit that we can in this COVID-19, with reallocation of points and all that. But once we have done that, let’s go back to the drawing board as I am not quite sure whether it (WTC) entirely fits the purpose and has achieved what it intended to after being conceptualised four to five years back," Barclays commented. The new chairman discussed several other issues like making changes to the cricket calendar, providing context to bilateral series, and handling T20 leagues around the world. Now, at the helm, he will have to face all these issues head-on.